Is The Written Ct Driving Test Hard

AGAINST THE PD Masiello!


publish the amazing and heavy statements by the Secretary of the PD Alifano Gianfranco Di Caprio in the aftermath of some of the statements of Mayor Masiello appeared in a local newspaper. It 's the first time that a top local PD is exposed publicly so hard against one of its affiliated. But nothing else. good read.

Alife (Ce) - With reference to Article published in the press that the Mayor of Raviscanina, and Chairman of the Regional Park of Matese and vice president of the Consortium of methane (which sees the former Mayor of Anderson, President, Chambers. Roberto Vitelli), highlighted the poor outcome by PD in the Province of Caserta (particularly in the City of Anderson), I feel obliged, having been called into question directly with the entire leadership of the PD alif, make some clarifications. Accepting the invitation to a deep reflection on the outcome of the election results, what I have already completed in the session meeting of the Democratic Party of Anderson's April 9, 2010 (when I was renewed in a plebiscite never set an appointment under discussion), I say I'm completely in agreement with Masiello's statement that the leadership must work hard for a genuine reconstruction and the offer must be revised policy because people no longer consider themselves in our political project. " What divides us is not the form but the substance. The Democratic Party in Alife has collected 655 votes with 453 preferences attributed to Vincenzo Cappello, a candidate for the Region for the PD: Well, the contribution given by the City of Anderson, Vincenzo Cappello represents 6% of all the votes he received in the Province of Caserta. Do you think that in all ten other municipalities in the Board No 1 of Anderson (one of the county for instance) the overall preferences Hats were for 668: how to say that Anderson, by itself, is valid for the Mayor of Glossop result of almost all other municipalities that decide and have decided on the Provincial Nominee of the Democratic Party. The vote in provincial, however, saw 172 to allocate preferences to Alife Masiello (PD) and 406 to Gizzi (Moderated by Stellato), for a total of 578 votes PD area. Even before the elections has been unleashed a cloud of dust on the question of support of the Club Official or PD of Anderson's candidacy Masiello. I repeat, never the PD of Anderson chose to leave the official candidate. The bottom line is much simpler: a large part of the PD Alifano were recognized in the application of our Vince Gizzi rationed in the list "Moderated by Stellato. Think about flipping through the newspapers that I could appreciate the great satisfaction of the Democratic Party of St. Mark the Evangelist to the success of Gabriele Cicala elected with 1,928 votes (about 18% of the vote): success shared by the Mayor, the section of the PD (secretary head) and Hon. Stephen Graziano. Only detail that was unknown to me: Cicala was elected in his list of "Moderate to Stella." At this point I would ask Masiello a thought: is not that an excess of presenteeism for its part has made it possible for the electorate Alifano not recognize his proposal, asking in turn legitimate visibility? Non è che forse la gente è stanca della solita politica e della ricerca affannata della poltrona? Non è che forse i cittadini sono stufi di vedersi rappresentati sempre dagli stessi personaggi? E con quali risultati? Avrà provato a pensare che i ruoli che occupa sono dovuti in parte anche ai voti che il Partito Democratico raccoglie in altri contesti come quello di Alife? I voti personali per Masiello a Raviscanina (467) rappresentano un ottimo risultato: sapete Vincenzo Cappello quanti ne ha presi? 134. Perché questo divario enorme? Aggiungo un’ultima considerazione numerica. Nel suo manifesto di ringraziamento ha evidenziato lo scarso risultato ottenuto ad Alife. La cosa simpatica (e opportunamente trascurata) è che, se anche tutti i voti raccolti dal centro-sinistra ad Alife (compresi quelli di IdV e SeL) fossero andati al candidato del PD, questo avrebbe raggiunto 2.051 preferenze nel Collegio, pari al 15% dei voti validi. Ovvero la non elezione: come cinque anni fa del resto, quando Masiello, appoggiato dall’allora Margherita, raccolse ad Alife poco più di 300 preferenze! Tutti sono bravi a cercare colpevoli o capri espiatori, ma le valutazioni si fanno sulla base di ragionamenti o, meglio ancora, dei numeri: quindi colgo questa unica ed ultima occasione per invitare Masiello ad una riflessione comune, senza dare adito ad ulteriori ed inutili polemiche che nulla aggiungono al già difficile percorso di costruzione del PD locale e casertano.

Il Segretario del Circolo PD di Alife, Gianfranco Di Caprio


(FONTE: http://altocasertano.wordpress.com)

Honda Pilot 2003 Guide Speaker

POLICY, a very fine thread


La congenialità delle elezioni e, se vogliamo, il fascino di esse è in quel filo sottilissimo che separa l'opinabile dalla certezza. E' affascinante osservare come le promesse, i comizi, le campagne elettorali serrate poi sfocino (e talvolta naufraghino) nella certezza del dato elettorale. Nel risultato, insomma. Io amo molto la polemica, il confronto, le idee ma -chi mi conosce lo sa- sono particolarmente attratto anche dal "risultato finale" , dal compimento concreto e obbligatorio senza il quale le parole, così importanti e profonde, produrrebbero solo altre parole, perdendo di fatto il loro intenso significato.

E oggi voglio parlare proprio di dati, date e numeri, analizzando concretamente la disfatta elettorale del sindaco Masiello.
Dopo la vittoria facile del 2003 alle elezioni comunali (190 voti di scarto sulla lista Forza Pares del dott. Castrillo), nel 2005 comincia la scalata alla poltrona del consiglio provinciale da parte del nostro sindaco, che si candida con la (fu) Margherita ottenendo 1899 voti in totale, 559 dei quali provenienti da Raviscanina. Troppo poco, ed Ermanno va incontro alla sua prima batosta elettorale: non eletto.
Tutto continua ad essere facile, però, tra le mura amiche della Rupe and 2008, specifically in the municipal elections of April 13, the coalition Freedom and Progress demolishing the list opposing ( Together for Raviscanina ) obtaining 728 votes against 378 number. A gap so wide, in Raviscanina, had never seen.
After the landslide, the provincial scale of 2010 is much more realistic task looming for mayor: the result of 2005 in fact, even bankruptcy, was the son of an obvious political inexperience dictated by age. In 2010 however, after the experience at provincial, after five years of municipal government, and thus power, the votes would presumably be doubled (at least!) or at least almost always ends up that way. The smell of flying is too close not to try to stand out. But here's thin resume that thread, the thread that the expected and the "almost", it flows ... sinking in reality. The elections of 28 and 29 April 2010, after hearing so much from the mayor and his loyalists, recite preferences Raviscanina 467 Masiello, 1483 preferences in the college total. Five years after the first major political defeat, not only the mayor can not win votes, but even in losing. 416 in total, 92 in Raviscanina. The flight is still delayed. This time who knows when.
But there is still a given to be analyzed, the data that I'm sure it hurts most of all. For today, not yet two years have passed since April 13, 2008, date to the list of the 728 votes Masiello, the largest victory in the history of our city. Yet the same Masiello, after two years scarce, must deal with a haemorrhage of votes at least as frightening his victory in the municipal in 2008. Ermanno lost 261 votes in 700 days. Almost one in every three days. Numbers slaughter policy.
These are the numbers. These data. These are the facts.

Only by starting with these realities can be moved in subsequent considerations. For example, one might wonder why this disaster. Or rather they might ask himself, why do we reply, 'and we always write our blog since last June 26, just to stay on the subject of dates. The motivation is called trash, but also water, taxes increased barbarously, inefficient services, public works absurd, waste, neglect, unemployment, pharmacy closed, zero zero preservation of ecology and development of the territory.

Obviously, I'd be a fool if you do not admit, the haemorrhaging of votes is certainly also the result of alliances by Dr. unprofitable. Ermanno. It 'clear that the list Ordem y progreso , someone has thrown water to its mill. And the mills, it seems, are many. Other than speculating on the statements of votes (real or presumed) of Quinctius! Instead of worrying about the votes of the opposition, it would be better to try to secure the votes of not at all easy climbing companions. votes that the mayor, also rightly, calculated as safe. But they lack the votes. It lacks a lot.

And so we find ourselves on that thin thread, one step after the onset of a great political career finally outside the borders of Raviscanina. And so, after it passed, after having come to terms with the end result (what the real mystery of words), we find ourselves facing a defeat daughter of many causes, not least the lack of confidence suffered by your own election team.

Gentlemen, it's politics. You do, and you suffer. In this case, you, the fine thread. The thread that makes words and strategies a pleasant prelude intrusiveness of objectivity, inevitability dell'imprescindibile final result.


And this time is a Waterloo. From every point of view.



GVN



PS: Data on elections are from the website of the Ministry of Interior (www.interno.it).

PS 2: my sincere wishes for a happy Easter to our readers from the staff of RaviscaninaVoceLibera.